Presidential Communications Operations Office



  PIA Bldg, Visayas Ave, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines
  Tuesday, 21 August 2018 News Before 1 Feb 2012. Click for Latest
Web PIA  
 
home
 
about
 
fotos
 
info
 
links
 
ncrr01carr02r03calmimr05r06r07r08r09r10r11r12r13
 << August 2018 >> 
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Special News Editions:
English.Tagalog.Cebuano
Ilocano.Waray.Hiligaynon
Pangasinan.Other
PIA Specials:
NEW! Cabinet Officials
Jobs.Slides.Specials.Ads. Events.ASEAN.Multimedia
Visitors since 15 Feb 2011:
PIA News Archive:
English.Tagalog.Cebuano
Waray.Hiligaynon.Ilocano
Pangasinan.All
PIA Archive News Reader

PIA Press Release
2007/10/10

Commentary: JPEPA needs to be renegotiated?

By Henry S. Lagasca

San Fernando City, La Union (10 October) -- Senate foreign relations committee chair, Sen. Miriam Defensor-Santiago, said that after the committee's fifth and penultimate hearing this week, she is personally convinced that the proposed Japan-Philippine Economic Partnership Agreement (JPEPA) is "unconstitutional".

Along with Santiago, Sen. Mar Roxas, chair of the Senate trade and commerce committee, shared his view on the "unconstitutionality" of the economic partnership agreement but quick to add that they will recommend that it be renegotiated.

The Arroyo government has repeatedly said that the country's gain from the treaty could bring concessions that would allow the Philippines to supply Japan's rising demand for health workers considering Japan's aging population would require more foreign nurses and caregivers.

The agreement would also ensure market access for the country's agricultural products through free tariffs of major farm and fishery exports to Japan.

JPEPA was signed by President Arroyo and former Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi on Sept. 9, 2006. The treaty requires concurrence of the Senate. Unless the treaty is ratified by the Senate by a two-thirds vote, the JPEPA cannot take effect.

As explained by legal experts during the committee hearings and even presented position papers before the Senate, the agreement violated constitutional safeguards on national patrimony.

That the JPEPA violated the Constitution because it gave the Japanese the right to exploit the country's marine resources and it also gave the Japanese businesses the right to own land.

At this point, the Senate must consider the country's gains from the treaty and must show its support by making "healthy corrections" on the legal infirmities of the treaty. Anyway, part of its recommendation is for a renegotiated JPEPA.

The treaty's constitutionality is a fundamental priority and that the Senate is also morally obliged, in aid of legislation, to plug inadvertently legal loopholes on laws which pertains to a national development policy to be formed in the future. (PIA Region 1) [top]

|«  prev  next  »|
DAILY NEWS LIST:
»9th Likha ng Central Luzon trade fair held
»Central Luzon holds contingency planning on avian flu
»9th Likha ng Central Luzon underway
»ConsumerNet 3 steps up consumer-related concerns
»Pampanga gov reveals 3-year agenda
»Bright Child photo contest launched in Central Luzon
»Malnutrition linked to neglect of parents, poverty, lifestyle
»Feature: Fighting malnutrition, hunger
»Siquijor tree planting activity highlights CSC anniversary
»NSO Siquijor celebrates October as National Statistics Month
|«  prev  next  »|

Philippine Official Gazette | Office of the President | Presidential Communications Operations Office
For comments and feedback, please email PIA Newsdesk
Copyright © 2005 Philippine Information Agency
PIA Building, Visayas Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City 1101 Philippines